Enterprise ERP implementation

ERP that actually goes live.

Enterprise systems fail on people and process, not software. We handle both — so your ERP is running, adopted, and paying for itself.

24

implementations delivered

1,400+

users trained and live

6

industries served

4.5 mo

average time to go-live

Why ERP projects fail

It is rarely the software.

Scope that grows quietly, data nobody cleaned, a process no one mapped, and users told three weeks before go-live. Four failures, in the order a project usually meets them.

Every phase of our method exists to close one of these.

Months 2–7

Scope that grows quietly

Ten changes, each reasonable on its own, none of them priced. We price and schedule every change in writing before it is approved.

Discovered at go-live

Data nobody cleaned

Everyone assumes the ledger is fine because nobody has opened it. We audit master data in week one and rehearse migration repeatedly.

Week 1 onward

Processes never mapped

The workshop describes how the process should run; the floor runs something else. We document what actually happens before configuring anything.

Three weeks before go-live

Users told too late

Most staff first see the system the week it replaces their job. We start training and super-users during build, not after.

How we deliver

Five phases. No surprises in month seven.

ERP projects rarely fail on software. They fail on scope that grows quietly, data nobody cleaned, a process no one mapped, and users who heard about the change three weeks before go-live. Our method exists to close those four gaps in order.

Open a phase to see what happens in it and what you get at the end.

Two to four weeks on site with the people who do the work. We document every process that will touch the new system, find the spreadsheets holding your operation together, and audit the state of your master data. You get a current-state map and a written scope you can hold us to.

What you get

Current-state process map

Data quality audit

Scoped requirements register

Indicative budget and timeline

Go-live day is not the finish line. The first month-end close is.

Why our consultants stay on the floor after the system is switched on — the phase most partners bill for and skip.

Platforms

The right platform is a question about your processes, not your headcount.

Two businesses the same size can need completely different systems. A distributor running six branches and a consultancy billing time have almost nothing in common. So we describe each platform by the operating conditions that suit it — and the ones that should send you elsewhere.

Straight answers

The questions every buyer asks in the first call.

For a single-entity mid-market business on Zoho, Odoo or Business Central, three to six months from kickoff to go-live. Multi-entity or multi-country rollouts on SAP or Finance & Operations run nine to eighteen months, and we phase them so the first entity goes live early. Anyone quoting six weeks for an enterprise ERP is quoting for a demo, not an implementation.

Implementation typically runs between one and two times your first-year licence cost, depending on how many processes are in scope and how bad the data is. We give you a five-year total cost model during selection — licences, infrastructure, implementation and the internal staff time nobody budgets for — so the board sees the real number before signing.

Yes, and it is common. We pick up implementations that were sold by a reseller with no delivery capacity, or that stalled after an internal lead left. We start with a short assessment of what is configured, what is scoped and what is salvageable, then give you a written plan to finish.

First we find out why it actually failed, which is rarely the reason stated. It is usually scope drift, unmapped processes, dirty data, or users who were never brought along. Our Rescue engagement is a fixed two to three week assessment producing an honest recommendation — including telling you when the right answer is to stop and re-select.

We deliver on Microsoft, SAP, Odoo, Sage and Zoho, so we have no commercial reason to favour one. During selection we score against your requirements and tell you plainly when a cheaper platform will do the job — and when it will not.

We stay through the first month-end close, which is the moment problems surface. After that you move onto a support agreement with response times in writing, and a quarterly review that catches the processes people have quietly worked around.

That is the intent. We build a super-user in each department during implementation and hand over documentation written for your processes, not the vendor manual. Clients who keep us on support do it for upgrades and new modules, not because they are stuck.

Next step

Talk to someone who has done this before.

Thirty minutes, no pitch deck. Tell us where you are — mid-selection, mid-project, or recovering from one that stalled — and we will tell you what we would do.